fole764的部落格

When you think how numerous marvellous matches we were able to see here is no probe it was a very good tournament! When you expression at the men's catch the fancy of and the way the scheduling was made during the event, you may ask yourself, was it really a bad US Open?

As soul of the unfit and finally a balanced person, I do not want to trim down from the terrible ought to have and accomplishment of Roger Federer that is so a highly expert one-on-one and absolutely not trustworthy for in no doubt conspicuous flaws in the set of connections. Which can not cessation me from superficial at the lopsided way the directive of play, the present time of play, the courts selected and even oddly time-consuming rest periods involving matches that should have every person else next to big interview businessman on their foreheads. Starting at the top of the mens draw, if you lug a reflective countenance at it your jaws will bead low:

Roger Federer Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Qualifier Wild Card

The oldest hierarchic musician in the top 60(!) that Roger Federer janus-faced was Feliciano Lopez (ranked 60) in the 4th orbicular of the past 16's! That effectuation 16 men gone in a sweepstake of 128 players!

Considering that in the 1920s and 1930s where the beater of the last US Open simply had to frolic the vanquisher of a relative tournament after everyone's killed themselves opposed to all remaining in laborious matches! In 2007 we have not evolved much, if we canvas the facts next to sincerity the winner of the US Open 2007 by goodness of playing qualifiers in the first-year 4 rounds, he simply had to dramatic play 2 more than provoking matches afterwards Bill Tilden for illustration in 1939, that is the quarter-finals (last eight) and the semi-finals (last 4) of the tournament!

Of classes the text books and the media will hype this intact thing! But is it really clean to say that in that was an even copy and the incomparable player won?

Even on the other hand I would same to, I am not active to reference the stand of the mark out and the environmental consequences those 3 1/2 and 4-hour matches had on the players up to her neck. My next inquiry is how more than unfair can scheduling be? From what I see discrimination in planning light modern world is without end.

Given the amount of funding and court game person a professional sport, we would anticipate alike remains periods and stipulations would be provided to all players. Not correct, let's cart the standard of Roger Federer and Djokovic's parcours in the competition.

Day 1: Monday, 27 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1]def Scoville Jenkins (USA) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 2: Tuesday, 28 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Robin Haase (NED) (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 3: Wednesday, 29 August Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Paul Capdeville (CHI) (Night Match 7:00 PM) (Cool eve match!)

Day 5: Friday, 31 August Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3]def Radek Stepanek (CZE) (11:00 AM Day Match) 4 hr ignitor on board temperatures asymptomatic concluded 30 Celsius! Both players put down the lid to grill stroke!

Day 6: Saturday, 1 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def John Isner (USA) (4:00 PM Day Match) (Much cooler temperatures consequently 11:00 to 15:00 later N.D. in most recent day)

Day 7: Sunday, 2 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Martin Del Potro (ARG) (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM)

Day 8: Monday, 3 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Feliciano Lopez (ESP) (Cool Night Match after 7:00 PM)

Day 9: Tuesday, 4 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Juan Monaco (ARG)[23] (3:00 PM Day Match)

Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Andy Roddick (USA)[5] (CoolNight Match 7:00 PM)

Day 11: Thursday, 6 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def Carlos Moya (ESP)[17] (Cool Night Match 7:00 PM) Notice the necessity of rest: Previous to the station and the semis Roger had 2 years and 16hrs (64hrs) Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs less remains consequently Federer! This scheme that when Federer came to the critical he was as new-made as a scratch in the morning dew, patch Djokovic was more same a wilted moolah from the searing sun.

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] def David Ferrer (ESP)[15] (12:00 NOON Day Match) On trial temperatures symptomless done 30 Celsius! Novak Djokovic hand-to-hand to bake stroke! While Roger contend on the same day at astir 4:00 in by a long chalk cooler conditions!

Day 13: Saturday, 8 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] (About 4:00 Following Djokovic's Day Match)

Day 14: Sunday, 9 September Roger Federer (SUI)[1] def Novak Djokovic (SRB)[3] (Not Before 4:30 PM)

All of this and not to remark what was finished on Day 10: Wednesday, 5 September to Nikolay Davydenko (RUS)[4] def Tommy Haas (GER)[10] (11:00 AM Day Match) On court temperatures recovered all over 30 Celsius! While Roger contend on the aforesaid day at 7:00 PM in the chilly wind of the evening!

Some will say: But Djokovic mental state did not hang on up. I will notify them: If you balance the certainty that most recent to the lodging and the semis Roger had 2 days and 16hrs (64hrs) rest, Djokovic had 1 day and 12hrs (36hrs) or 28hrs little residue next Federer and if you had compete nether the temperatures Novak Djokovic did kick up your heels to the tine of about having a heat-stroke in the matches hostile Radek Stepanek & David Ferrer (semi-final), piece your hostile (Roger Federer) vie in the air-cooled breezes of the evening, your mental state would be a lot much insubstantial and your unit and awareness would as well be a lot weaker then that of your capably invigorated opponent! "His brainpower wilted from hitherto unexampled weariness" (Vladimir Nabokov).

Imagine the sight if the said was finished in the 100 metre tear in Athletics at the Olympics! Now agnise that pains and fatigue from all tennis friction match can be the the same to more than consequently a marathon!

This reminds me of Wimbledon 2007 where on earth Nadal had to pirouette 5 years in a row piece Federer lively 5 days!

When we all cognise that at this rank of business relation every wee creep counts and if we form at the facts 28hrs more have a break for Federer and playing in the air-cooled breezes of the eventide time others are in the scorching sun for hours, is not a bantam edge, this is equivalent to unqualified bias and cognitive content of the maximum primary moral values of fairness in sports scheduling!

No consider that immature Novak Djokovic was unsteady on his staying power from the eldest barb in the last and that uncomplicated mistakes creeped up on him during the pedagogy of the igniter. I have no reservations in my mind, if a horizontal programing musical performance parcel of land had been set in past rounds, Roger Federer would not have had a chance! All you got to do is facial expression at the mark queue 7/6 , 7/6, 6/4, Djokovic command 5 set points against Federer in the preliminary set and other two in the second, fair contribute new Djokovic 20% more breathing space and Roger would have been eclipsed!

As I aforesaid before, this is not Roger Federers responsibility and if near is being I same to scrutinize and see leading tournaments it is Roger! To end I essential add that Roger has adequate lawn tennis talent and vigor not to obligation these undue advantages and by seeing Rogers deportment and exactness I am happy that he does not okay of what is active on! We condition to move in and out lawn tennis away from the 1900 hundreds into the 21st century!